Skip to content
Resilience agents
Risk, Trust & ResilienceResilienceContracts, Fourth Parties & Regulatory Registers

Fourth-Party Dependency Mapper

Finds the subcontractors, platforms and locations beneath a direct provider.

Combines disclosed subcontractors, architecture, network telemetry, bills of materials, contracts and external intelligence into a confidence-scored dependency chain. It exposes shared cloud, telecom, data and specialist-service dependencies while preserving unknowns instead of inventing a complete supply chain.

Authority

Inform

Team role

Provides specialist analysis

Handoffs

Named collaborators

The role

What it owns and where its authority ends

Desk

Contracts, Fourth Parties & Regulatory Registers

Desk workflow

Diligence findings, then resilience clause review, then fourth-party mapping, then DORA and internal register updates, then legal and owner attestation.

Collaboration

Works within a defined desk workflow

Decision boundary

Provides evidence or analysis without committing the decision.

Systems and capabilities involved

  • Vendor subcontractor disclosures

  • Architecture and network inventory

  • Software and service bills of materials

  • External entity intelligence

Handoffs

What this role gives and receives

Capabilities offered

Map fourth-party dependencies

Build a confidence-scored subcontractor and infrastructure chain.

Receives:
Vendor, contracted service, disclosures, architecture and evidence scope
Returns:
Dependency graph, shared nodes, changes, locations and unknowns

External handoff

Vendor management

External handoff

Enterprise architecture

External handoff

Cyber supply-chain risk

Context

What the role needs to do the work

Current work
Provider, service, candidate fourth parties, evidence and unresolved edges.
Prior interactions
Prior disclosures, provider changes and incident-confirmed dependencies.
Policies and reference
Corporate entities, cloud regions, service taxonomy and infrastructure providers.
Working method
Dependency confidence, materiality and notification rules.

Illustrative workflow

How the work moves

Starting point

A provider announces a new subprocessor for identity verification.

  1. 01

    Resolve the subprocessor entity, service, locations and upstream infrastructure.

  2. 02

    Link affected contracts and important business services.

  3. 03

    Recalculate concentration and trigger contract-notice review.

Result

Updated dependency graph with two affected services and one new concentration signal.

Checks and boundaries

What must be tested or reviewed

  1. 01Identifies a shared cloud region beneath two differently branded SaaS vendors.
  2. 02Labels an inferred subcontractor edge as unconfirmed when only DNS evidence exists.
  3. 03Alerts on a material hosting-location change without treating an entity rename as a new provider.

Human authority

  • Vendor confirms material inferred dependencies
  • Risk owner accepts unresolved opacity

Keep exploring