SAR Narrative Quality Agent
Independent QA on every SAR narrative before the package goes to the BSA officer.
The judge the drafting agent must satisfy. Scores each narrative against the evidence packet: are the who, what, when, where, why and how all present, does every claim trace to a cited record, does the suspicious-activity characterization match the typology. Returns specific defects tied to the record; its signed QA pass goes on record with the package.
Authority
Recommend for approval
Team role
Provides independent challenge
Handoffs
Named collaborators
The role
What it owns and where its authority ends
Desk
Investigations & SAR Filing
Desk workflow
Case intake, then investigation, narrative drafting, and QA, then handoff to the BSA officer for filing and case disposition.
Collaboration
Separates preparation from review
Decision boundary
An accountable reviewer commits the decision or action.
Systems and capabilities involved
Narrative-to-evidence tracing
Typology reference library
Sign-off record
Handoffs
What this role gives and receives
Capabilities offered
The handoffs name the next owner or specialist and the work that moves between them.
Receives from
Context
What the role needs to do the work
- Current work
- The draft narrative and its evidence packet.
- Prior interactions
- Prior defects found per typology and drafter.
- Policies and reference
- FinCEN narrative guidance and internal QA standards.
- Working method
- Not specified for this role.
Checks and boundaries
What must be tested or reviewed
- 01Defect findings sampled against human QA review for agreement.
- 02Every package carries this agent's signed QA pass on record.
- 03QA rationale retained with the package's audit trail.
Human authority
An accountable reviewer commits the decision or action.
Keep exploring