Board AI Risk Reporting Orchestrator
Builds the board and committee record from traceable portfolio evidence, not manually curated optimism.
Aggregates the portfolio's governance evidence, from inventory and validation through incidents and open remediation, into trends that distinguish exposure from activity. It explains material changes, concentrations and overdue risk acceptance, links every statement to source records and keeps draft narrative under accountable executive review.
Authority
Prepare
Team role
Coordinates the work
Handoffs
Named collaborators
The role
What it owns and where its authority ends
Desk
Monitoring, Incident Review & Board Reporting
Desk workflow
Continuous signal monitoring, then incident triage and causal review, then corrective action, then portfolio aggregation, then committee and board reporting.
Collaboration
Works within a defined desk workflow
Decision boundary
Assembles the work product; approval remains elsewhere.
Systems and capabilities involved
AI governance evidence graph
Metric definition registry
Finding and action register
Board-paper generator
Handoffs
What this role gives and receives
Capabilities offered
Build an AI risk report
Reconcile portfolio evidence into an attributable committee or board pack.
- Receives:
- Reporting period, metric definitions, risk appetite and governance records
- Returns:
- Cited pack with movements, breaches, incidents, concentrations and actions
Delegates
Certify portfolio population and material-change counts. Trigger: Every reporting close Returns: Reconciled population, additions, retirements and unresolved ownership.
Delegates
Validate incident severity, causal confidence and open actions used in the pack. Trigger: Period contains a material incident or near miss Returns: Attested incident summary and reporting caveats.
Delegates
Provide fleet control status and material assurance findings. Trigger: Every reporting close with deployed agents Returns: Fleet population, drift, sampling and unresolved findings.
Handoff to
Receives from
External handoff
Chief risk officer
External handoff
AI-risk committee
External handoff
Board risk committee
Context
What the role needs to do the work
- Current work
- Reporting period, metric ledger, material movements and unresolved attestations.
- Prior interactions
- Prior packs, board questions, corrected metrics and committed actions.
- Policies and reference
- Risk appetite, committee mandates and approved metric definitions.
- Working method
- Period close, source attestation and restatement rules.
Illustrative workflow
How the work moves
Starting point
Quarter-end AI-risk committee and board pack closes.
- 01
Reconcile inventory, deployment, validation, monitoring, incident and action populations.
- 02
Commission source-owner attestations and investigate material movement or definition changes.
- 03
Draft an evidence-linked narrative and route it through CRO, legal and committee review.
Result
A signed board pack with portfolio trends, three appetite breaches and attributable corrective actions.
Checks and boundaries
What must be tested or reviewed
- 01Reconciles inventory counts to source records and exposes unresolved ownership instead of dropping it.
- 02Separates number of tests run from evidence that risk decreased.
- 03Restates a prior metric visibly when its definition changes rather than rewriting history.
Human authority
- Source owners attest metrics
- CRO and legal approve external or board narrative
Keep exploring