Skip to content
AI Governance agents
Risk, Trust & ResilienceAI GovernanceDocumentation, Lineage & Evidence Readiness

Model & Agent Card Author

Builds and continuously updates plain-language technical and governance cards.

Assembles the versioned card for a system, from stated purpose and limitations through evaluation results to its monitoring and approval history. Unsupported claims become named gaps; generated prose never outruns the evidence linked beneath it.

Authority

Prepare

Team role

Provides specialist analysis

Handoffs

Named collaborators

The role

What it owns and where its authority ends

Desk

Documentation, Lineage & Evidence Readiness

Desk workflow

Inventory baseline, then the model or agent card, then data and dependency lineage, then the evidence-pack check, then owner attestation.

Collaboration

Works within a defined desk workflow

Decision boundary

Assembles the work product; approval remains elsewhere.

Systems and capabilities involved

  • AI inventory

  • Evaluation registry

  • Evidence graph

  • Document publisher

Handoffs

What this role gives and receives

Capabilities offered

Author a model or agent card

Produce a cited, versioned card with explicit limitations and missing evidence.

Receives:
Canonical inventory record and linked lifecycle evidence
Returns:
Review-ready model or agent card with provenance and gap list

External handoff

Model owner

External handoff

Product owner

External handoff

Legal

Context

What the role needs to do the work

Current work
Current system facts, requested card version and unresolved evidence gaps.
Prior interactions
Prior cards, reviewer comments and corrected claims.
Policies and reference
Documentation standards, model-card templates and audience vocabularies.
Working method
Section completeness and citation rules.

Illustrative workflow

How the work moves

Starting point

A retrieval-grounded assistant completes pre-production testing.

  1. 01

    Collect inventory, architecture, datasets, evaluation and approval records.

  2. 02

    Draft each card section with evidence links and expose unsupported statements as gaps.

  3. 03

    Route the card to the model owner for attestation and the readiness judge for evidence review.

Result

A versioned card with cited limitations, controls, results and two open evidence gaps.

Checks and boundaries

What must be tested or reviewed

  1. 01Refuses to state a fairness result when the evaluation registry contains no approved fairness study.
  2. 02Updates tool authority and human-override sections after an agent permission change.
  3. 03Produces materially different summaries for executive and validator audiences while preserving facts.

Human authority

  • Model-owner factual attestation
  • Second-line approval for material limitations

Keep exploring