Financial Crime · Agent pack
SAR drafting and filing preparation
Cadre pack · Scribe
Prepares and checks a draft filing package, or records the supplied no-SAR outcome, for accountable review.
Demonstrated on representative cases. Source coverage, thresholds, policy interpretation, escalation design, and performance require institution-specific validation.
Operating dossier
The job, permitted decisions, and owner
Mandate
Assembles and checks a draft SAR package from the investigation record, then routes it to accountable bank personnel for approval and submission.
- Case arrives with
- Case ID · Customer · Name · Alert ref · Customer · ID
- Allowed outcomes
- SAR · no-SAR
- Where it fits
- Alert to SAR
Operating logic
- 01Assembles and checks a draft SAR package from a completed investigation packet; accountable bank personnel retain approval and submission responsibility.
- 02Every fact in the narrative must trace to the packet; a thin packet yields a short, honest draft, never one padded with invented specifics.
- 03Prepares a SAR only when the packet recommends one — a no-SAR or continue-monitoring recommendation is recorded as such, not converted into a report.
- 04Surfaces the filing date carried in the supplied case policy, including the illustrated no-suspect extension, while keeping any sanctions nexus visible for review.
Decision logic
- 01Assembles and checks a draft SAR package from a completed investigation packet; accountable bank personnel retain approval and submission responsibility.
- 02Every fact in the narrative must trace to the packet; a thin packet yields a short, honest draft, never one padded with invented specifics.
- 03Prepares a SAR only when the packet recommends one — a no-SAR or continue-monitoring recommendation is recorded as such, not converted into a report.
- 04Surfaces the filing date carried in the supplied case policy, including the illustrated no-suspect extension, while keeping any sanctions nexus visible for review.
- Must not
- Invent missing evidence or act outside the permitted outcomes.
- Human owner
- Approval to submit a regulatory filing
- Evidence retained
- Structured outcome, observed path, and the source evidence used.
Case and record
One case, from supplied evidence to recorded decision
Supplied case
- Case ID
- CASE-A3
- Customer · Name
- Horizon Import Export Inc
- Alert ref
- A3
- Customer · ID
- C7
- Customer · Type
- business
- Customer · Risk rating
- high
- Customer · Country
- United States
- Customer · Profile
- General trading company; vague stated purpose; thin file; opaque beneficial ownership.
- Subjects
- 5 items
- Timeline
- 4 items
View the case data
Case key funnel-sar
{
"caseId": "CASE-A3",
"alertRef": "A3",
"customer": {
"id": "C7",
"name": "Horizon Import Export Inc",
"type": "business",
"riskRating": "high",
"country": "United States",
"profile": "General trading company; vague stated purpose; thin file; opaque beneficial ownership."
},
"subjects": [
{
"name": "Horizon Import Export Inc",
"role": "account holder",
"sanctionsScreened": true,
"sanctionsResult": "clear"
},
{
"name": "K. Adeyemi",
"role": "sender",
"sanctionsScreened": true,
"sanctionsResult": "clear"
},
{
"name": "L. Petrov",
"role": "sender",
"sanctionsScreened": true,
"sanctionsResult": "clear"
},
{
"name": "S. Rahman",
"role": "sender",
"sanctionsScreened": true,
"sanctionsResult": "clear"
},
{
"name": "Gulf Falcon General Trading FZE",
"role": "beneficiary",
"sanctionsScreened": true,
"sanctionsResult": "clear",
"adverseMedia": "High severity: named in regional press in connection with trade-based money laundering and mis-invoicing."
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"date": "2026-05-18",
"event": "Inbound wire $62,000 from K. Adeyemi (memo: invoice 0421)"
},
{
"date": "2026-05-18",
"event": "Inbound wire $58,000 from L. Petrov (memo: consulting)"
},
{
"date": "2026-05-19",
"event": "Inbound wire $60,000 from S. Rahman (memo: goods)"
},
{
"date": "2026-05-20",
"event": "Outbound wire $175,000 to Gulf Falcon General Trading FZE, UAE (memo: supplier settlement)"
}
],
"transactions": [
{
"id": "T7001",
"date": "2026-05-18",
"amount": 62000,
"currency": "USD",
"direction": "credit",
"method": "wire",
"counterparty": "K. Adeyemi",
"counterpartyCountry": "United States"
},
{
"id": "T7002",
"date": "2026-05-18",
"amount": 58000,
"currency": "USD",
"direction": "credit",
"method": "wire",
"counterparty": "L. Petrov",
"counterpartyCountry": "United States"
},
{
"id": "T7003",
"date": "2026-05-19",
"amount": 60000,
"currency": "USD",
"direction": "credit",
"method": "wire",
"counterparty": "S. Rahman",
"counterpartyCountry": "United States"
},
{
"id": "T7004",
"date": "2026-05-20",
"amount": 175000,
"currency": "USD",
"direction": "debit",
"method": "wire",
"counterparty": "Gulf Falcon General Trading FZE",
"counterpartyCountry": "United Arab Emirates"
}
],
"redFlags": [
"Three inbound wires from unrelated senders aggregated within 48 hours ($180,000)",
"Near-total pass-through: $175,000 (97%) wired out the next day, leaving negligible balance",
"Outbound beneficiary (Gulf Falcon, UAE) carries high-severity adverse media for trade-based laundering",
"Activity inconsistent with a thin-file trading company of vague stated purpose"
],
"typologyAssessment": "Funnel / pass-through account with trade-based money-laundering characteristics: unrelated inbound funds consolidated and rapidly moved cross-border to a higher-risk jurisdiction and a counterparty with TBML adverse media.",
"recommendation": "SAR",
"recommendationRationale": "Articulable suspicion from rapid pass-through, unrelated senders, and a TBML-linked UAE beneficiary, with no legitimate business rationale evident."
}Evaluation and limits
Evaluation coverage and stopping points
Published evaluation map
Expected decisions, boundaries, and costly failure modes.
These cases show what the pack is asked to decide, when it should stop, and which plausible errors the evaluation is meant to expose. They are not a reliability score or independent validation.
Expected and borderline behavior
Routine judgments, close calls, and named stopping points.
Funnel Sar
Case key
funnel-sarStructuring Sar
Case key
structuring-sarNo Sar
Case key
no-sar
Boundary and misuse cases
Plausible inputs that could produce a costly or overconfident decision.
Continue Monitoring
Case key
adv-continue-monitoringThin Facts
Case key
adv-thin-facts
Operating fit
Workflow placement and validation
Operating pattern
Draft, check, revise
Separate drafting from checking and stop when the work meets clear requirements—or when the agreed review limit is reached.
Decision sequence and workflow placement
- 01Draft from evidence
- 02Check named requirements
- 03Return specific gaps
- 04Revise
- 05Complete or refer
Wider workflows
Institution-specific validation
These questions remain open until the pack is fitted to an institution.
Validation questions
- Policy and legal interpretation
- Source coverage, quality, and freshness
- Thresholds and exception calibration
- Integration and degraded-mode behavior
- Human approval and escalation design
- Performance on the institution’s own case mix
Inputs, actions, and outcomes
- Case ID
- Customer · Name
- Alert ref
- Customer · ID
- Customer · Type
- Customer · Risk rating
- Customer · Country
- Customer · Profile
- Subjects
- Timeline
- Get sar requirementsget_sar_requirements
- Validate sarvalidate_sar
- File sarcommitfile_sar
- SAR
- no-SAR
Related packs