Skip to content
Four-eyes decision review pack

Representative capture · 10 Jul 2026

Four-eyes decision review

Cadre pack · Quorum

Re-derives a material decision without seeing the original answer, then concurs or dissents.

One frozen, sanitized execution on representative data. It shows an observed path and retained decision—not repeatability, production fitness, legal instruction, or regulatory compliance.

Recorded decision

Decision record

Verdict
Dissent

Four-Eyes Review Complete — DISSENT

FieldOriginal (maker)Re-derived (Quorum, blind)
dispositionclearblock
matchIdnull36 (OFAC SDN)
matchedName(none stated)AEROCARIBBEAN AIRLINES — score 1.0
rationale"Common airline name; false positive"Confirmed true positive, prohibited transaction

Why I dissent

The re-derivation was performed blind — the original outcome was not provided to or visible during the rederive call.

The maker's decision is wrong at every material level:

  1. The name is a perfect match, not a common name. "Aerocaribbean Airlines" / AEROCARIBBEAN AIRLINES is not a generic word like "National" or "International." It is a specific, distinctive name, and it hits OFAC SDN ID 36 at a match score of 1.0.

  2. Every secondary identifier corroborates the hit. Subject country = Cuba; SDN listing = Havana, Cuba, CUBA program. There is zero contradicting evidence. A score-1.0 match with full secondary-identifier alignment is the textbook definition of a confirmed true positive.

  3. The financial exposure is severe. An outbound USD 240,000 wire to an OFAC-listed Cuban entity is a prohibited transaction. Releasing it creates direct sanctions-violation liability and triggers mandatory OFAC blocking-report obligations under 31 C.F.R. § 501.604.


Immediate actions required of the control plane / Sanctions Compliance Officer

  • 🔴 Block the outbound wire immediately; do not execute.
  • Freeze associated funds/accounts.
  • File an OFAC blocking report within 10 business days.
  • Escalate to SCO for reporting and OFAC license review.
  • Investigate the maker agent's false-positive dismissal — a score-1.0 SDN hit being cleared suggests a possible systematic defect in the agent's tuning or threshold logic.
Decision record retained · contract-validated
Inspect the observed pathOpen the sanitized reasoning, actions, and ordered event record behind this decision.

Observed path

This is the retained public trace from one frozen representative execution. It is not a live run, a repeatability claim, or a complete production audit record.

Quorum
Briefed on the case

I will follow the blind re-derivation protocol strictly: rederive first, before I reason toward or reference the original outcome in any way.

I have my independent re-derived outcome. Now I'll run compare across all decision-bearing fields.

Every decision-bearing field diverges. I now have everything I need to commit my review.