Communications Surveillance Agent
Triages monitored e-comms and voice for conduct and information risk.
Reads the firm's email, chat and transcribed voice for conduct and information risk: off-channel dealing, MNPI leakage, collusion, harassment. Resolves lexicon false positives in context (a 'kill the trade' that is just a canceled order), reasoning over the full thread and participants. Routes concern flags to the conduct investigation agent; the accountable conduct reviewer dispositions each flag before any action.
Authority
Act within policy
Team role
Routes work to specialists
Handoffs
Named collaborators
The role
What it owns and where its authority ends
Desk
Trade & Communications Surveillance
Desk workflow
Alert generation from trade and comms models, then first-line triage and enrichment, then disposition (close or escalate) and case creation, with conduct-risk escalations re-checked by an oversight agent and dispositioned by the accountable compliance officer.
Collaboration
Calls several specialists in parallel
Decision boundary
Acts only within an explicit policy, permission and escalation boundary.
Systems and capabilities involved
Comms archive (e-comms + voice)
Transcription service
voice to text
HR + trading-book directory
who's speaking, what they trade
Escalation to conduct investigation agent
Handoffs
What this role gives and receives
Capabilities offered
The handoffs name the next owner or specialist and the work that moves between them.
Handoff to
Context
What the role needs to do the work
- Current work
- The message + its conversation thread and participants.
- Prior interactions
- Prior flags on the same participants or trading book.
- Policies and reference
- Conduct typologies, information-barrier rules, firm slang and aliases.
- Working method
- Not specified for this role.
Checks and boundaries
What must be tested or reviewed
- 01Gold-set precision/recall on a labeled conduct corpus; agent-as-judge sampling.
- 02Privacy guardrail: review scope and access logged immutably; scope stays within the approved mandate.
- 03Concern flags always route to the conduct investigation agent for investigation; the accountable conduct reviewer dispositions each flag before any action.
Human authority
Acts only within an explicit policy, permission and escalation boundary.
Keep exploring